Featured Article

Predication or not?

Discerning when it’s time to begin a fraud examination



The net revenue for a textile plant was significantly lower than projected even though sales had increased. The company couldn’t find evidence of fraud and didn’t detect unusual trends in financial data, so it attributed the cause to accounting errors. There were some minor inconsistencies in procurement of plant supplies, but the plant manager enforced strict controls, and validated purchases and requisitions each month. He hadn’t found any outliers. Though nobody discovered evidence on the surface, Charles Washington, CFE, wasn’t convinced. His continued investigation into the small procurement inconsistency led to the identification of a major vendor fraud committed by the supply supervisor who maintained duplicate ledgers to conceal his crimes from the plant manager and other executives. (Washington is now the senior director, global fraud and asset protection at Pfizer.)


For full access to story, members may sign in here.

Not a member? Click here to Join Now. Or Click here to sign up for a FREE TRIAL.

Related Articles

Getting the words right

For people who stammer — or stutter, if you’re in the U.S. — passing any business’s identity verification process can be frustrating. Customers with speech disorders like stammering may fail fraud detection controls because many of the tactics they use to manage or hide their speech impairment conflict with those controls.

Cracking the center

According to the United Nations, an estimated 200,000 people have been trafficked into cyber scam centers where they’re forced to commit fraud schemes, causing billions of dollars in losses worldwide. Fraud Magazine talks to experts fighting on the frontlines against forced criminality about what it will take to disrupt these cyber scam operations and what fraud examiners can do to help.

A case of workplace misconduct

In this case study — the first in a series covering compliance and investigation issues across the globe — the author, a veteran ethics and compliance professional, details a workplace misconduct investigation involving a senior business leader at a large organization in India. The inquiry, which began with harassment allegations, revealed other questionable activities the senior leader was engaged in.